Re: BUG #17220: ALTER INDEX ALTER COLUMN SET (..) with an optionless opclass makes index and table unusable

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Bossart, Nathan
Тема
Re: BUG #17220: ALTER INDEX ALTER COLUMN SET (..) with an optionless opclass makes index and table unusable
Дата
Msg-id
34B9319E-8FF3-4303-A94D-BCDBCDC7ED2C@amazon.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: BUG #17220: ALTER INDEX ALTER COLUMN SET (..) with an optionless opclass makes index and table unusable "Matthijs van der Vleuten" <postgresql@zr40.nl>
Re: BUG #17220: ALTER INDEX ALTER COLUMN SET (..) with an optionless opclass makes index and table unusable "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>
Re: BUG #17220: ALTER INDEX ALTER COLUMN SET (..) with an optionless opclass makes index and table unusable Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
On 10/18/21, 11:49 PM, "Matthijs van der Vleuten"  wrote:
> The test case doesn't seem entirely correct to me? The index being
> dropped (btree_tall_tbl_idx2) doesn't exist.

This was fixed before it was committed [0].

> Also, I don't believe this tests the case of dropping the index when
> it previously has been altered in this way.

That can still fail with the "has no options" ERROR, and fixing it
will still require a manual catalog update.  The ERROR is actually
coming from the call to index_open(), so bypassing it might require
some rather intrusive changes.  Given that it took over a year for
this bug to be reported, I suspect it might be more trouble than it's
worth.

Nathan

[0] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=fdd8857

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: parallelizing the archiver
От: Bossart, Nathan
Дата:
FAQ