Re: Shouldn't default multibyte encoding come from template database?
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Shouldn't default multibyte encoding come from template database? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20001114155750.02baacc0@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Shouldn't default multibyte encoding come from template database? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 23:31 13/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >Seems to me that it'd make more sense to >default to the encoding used by the DB you're copying. Comments? Definitely. Especially when/if people start using 'WITH TEMPLATE' for more databases. >It's actually a little worrisome that we even allow selection of >encoding during CREATE DATABASE. If template1 (or any other source >database) contains non-ASCII data It is probably woth issuing a NOTICE or WARNING when the requested encoding is different to the template. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: