Re: Add comma after e.g. and i.e.?

Bruce Momjian  writes:
> We are inconsistently about adding a comma after e.g. and i.e.:

> This summarizes the recommended behavior:
> 	https://jakubmarian.com/comma-after-i-e-and-e-g/
> 	In British English, “i.e.” and “e.g.” are not followed by a comma, so
> 	the first example above would be:
> 		They sell computer components, e.g. motherboards, graphic cards, CPUs.
> 	Virtually all American style guides recommend to follow both “i.e.” and
> 	“e.g.” with a comma (just like if “that is” and “for example” were used
> 	instead), so the very same sentence in American English would become:

> So, what do we want to do?  Leave it unchanged, or pick one of these
> styles?

I think it's fairly pointless to try to enforce such a thing.
Even if you made the docs 100% consistent on the issue today,
they wouldn't stay that way for long, because nobody else is
really going to care about it.

(FWIW, I generally write a comma myself.  But I'm not going
to cry about text that hasn't got one.)

			regards, tom lane