Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken
Дата
Msg-id
27354.1493614429@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken (Amit Kapila)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Amit Kapila writes: > Yeah, that's right. Today, I have spent some time to analyze how and > where retry logic is required. I think there are two places where we > need this retry logic, one is if we fail to reserve the memory > (pgwin32_ReserveSharedMemoryRegion) and second is if we fail to > reattach (PGSharedMemoryReAttach). I'm not following. The point of the reserve operation is to ensure that the reattach will work. What makes you think we need to add more code at that end? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления