Re: ldap/t/001_auth.pl fails with openldap 2.5

Andres Freund  writes:
> So, does anybody see a reason not to go for the trivial
> [ patch ]

I'd be happy to rely on the buildfarm's opinion here.

> Although I'm mildly tempted to rewrap the parameters, it's kinda odd how the
> trailing parameter on one line, has its value on the next line.

I'm betting that perltidy did that.  If you want to fix it so it
stays fixed, maybe reordering the parameters could help.

			regards, tom lane