Re: #XX000: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: #XX000: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated
Дата
Msg-id
2701260.1740065273@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
#XX000: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated (Dominique Devienne)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
#XX000: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>
Re: #XX000: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: #XX000: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>
Re: #XX000: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>
Re: #XX000: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>
Re: #XX000: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Dominique Devienne writes: > Hi. A tester just tried to restore two custom backups (not official > PostgreSQL ones) concurrently. > ... > The second session completed OK. > But the first session errors out with: > Error: DDL Error: GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA "SCH1", "SCH2" TO "SCH2:RO", > "SCH2:RW", "SCH2:SU": #XX000: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated > Thus I'm trying to understand what's going on. Since both restores tried to grant some permissions on SCH1, they both had to update SCH1's pg_namespace row (specifically nspacl). We have no support for concurrent updates in the catalog-manipulation code, so if the second run arrives at that step before the first one has committed its pg_namespace change, you get this error. > Is the issue related to trying to change SCHEMA ACLs for SCH1 concurrently, > in two long running transactions? How am I supposed to resolve this? The window is probably too small to hit if each restore is committing as it goes, but if you run in --single-transaction mode then this isn't surprising. I'd say don't try to run concurrent restores. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления