Re: with and trigger

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: with and trigger
Дата
в 15:21:29
Msg-id
2699.1559143289@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
with and trigger PegoraroF10 <marcos@f10.com.br>
Re: with and trigger Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: with and trigger Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
Re: with and trigger Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: with and trigger Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>
Re: with and trigger Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>
Re: with and trigger PegoraroF10 <marcos@f10.com.br>
Re: with and trigger Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabrizio@timbira.com.br>
Ron  writes:
> On 5/29/19 8:26 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This doesn't explicitly talk about triggers, but I think our attitude
>> about the case you're discussing is that the results are unspecified.
>> If a trigger fired in one WITH arm tries to look at the table(s)
>> modified by other WITH arms, it might or might not see those changes.

> Are CTEs still optimization fences?
> https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/blog/postgresql-ctes-are-optimization-fences/

Yes, if they contain data-modifying statements ... but that's not
relevant to the point at hand, which is that the run-time behavior
is not specified.

			regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Andreas Kretschmer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: with and trigger
От: Julie Nishimura
Дата:
FAQ