"James Shaw" <js102@zepler.net> writes:
>> I'm sorry, I misunderstood. I've reread, and understand where the
>> extra 100 comes from now. Perhaps this could be reworded:
>> ...
> Were there any thoughts on this? I was hoping this might be included in the
> manual, since I felt it was somewhat clearer.
Done, sorry for not getting to it sooner.
regards, tom lane