Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw
Дата
Msg-id
23896.1432577724@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw (Etsuro Fujita)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Etsuro Fujita writes:
> On 2015/05/22 23:50, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I think worrying about convalidated is pretty pointless. Really,
>> it is up to the user to determine what constraints should be attached
>> to the foreign table, and IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA can't help much.
> Agreed. So, I'd like to propose to update the docs as above. Please
> find attached a patch. The existing sentence "Checking other types of
> constraints is always left to the remote server." sounds to me that
> constraints on foreign tables are enforced locally when updating the
> foreign tables. So, I'd also like to propose to remove that sentence.
> Maybe I'm missing something though.
Yeah, I agree this documentation is inadequate; but I think it'd be a good
thing to spell out the reason why there's no support for importing check
constraints. I committed the attached enlarged version.
regards, tom lane
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/postgres-fdw.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/postgres-fdw.sgml
index 1079140..14b12e3 100644
*** a/doc/src/sgml/postgres-fdw.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/postgres-fdw.sgml
***************
*** 309,316 ****
using . This command creates
foreign table definitions on the local server that match tables or
views present on the remote server. If the remote tables to be imported
! have columns of user-defined data types, the local server must have types
! of the same names.
--- 309,316 ----
using . This command creates
foreign table definitions on the local server that match tables or
views present on the remote server. If the remote tables to be imported
! have columns of user-defined data types, the local server must have
! compatible types of the same names.
***************
*** 361,369 ****
Note that constraints other than NOT NULL</> will never be
! imported from the remote tables, since PostgreSQL</>
! does not support any other type of constraint on a foreign table.
! Checking other types of constraints is always left to the remote server.
--- 361,376 ----
Note that constraints other than NOT NULL</> will never be
! imported from the remote tables. Although PostgreSQL</>
! does support CHECK</> constraints on foreign tables, there is no
! provision for importing them automatically, because of the risk that a
! constraint expression could evaluate differently on the local and remote
! servers. Any such inconsistency in the behavior of a CHECK</>
! constraint could lead to hard-to-detect errors in query optimization.
! So if you wish to import CHECK</> constraints, you must do so
! manually, and you should verify the semantics of each one carefully.
! For more detail about the treatment of CHECK</> constraints on
! foreign tables, see .
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления