Re: elog() patch

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> OK, now that the elog() patch is in, we can discuss NOTICE.  I know
> Peter wants to keep NOTICE to reduce the number of changes, but I
> already have a few votes that the existing NOTICE messages should be
> changed to a tag of WARNING.

If you're taking a vote, I vote with Peter.  I don't much care for the
thought of EXPLAIN results coming out tagged WARNING ;-)

In any case, simple renamings like this ought to be carried out as part
of the prefix-tagging of elog names that we intend to do late in 7.3,
no?  I see no value in having two rounds of widespread changes instead
of just one.
        regards, tom lane