Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1
Дата
Msg-id
2316565.1668827411@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1 (Andres Freund)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1 Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1 Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Andres Freund writes: > On 2022-11-18 15:55:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> We realized today [1] that it's been some time since the buildfarm >> had any debug_discard_caches (nee CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS) coverage. > Do we know when it was covered last? I assume it's before the addition of > test_oat_hooks in 90efa2f5565? As far as that goes: some digging in the buildfarm DB says that avocet last did a CCA run on 2021-10-22 and trilobite on 2021-10-24. They were then offline completely until 2022-02-10, and when they restarted the runtimes were way too short to be CCA tests. Seems like maybe we need a little more redundancy in this bunch of buildfarm animals. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата: