Re: proposal: unescape_text function

On 10.03.21 14:52, David Steele wrote:
>> I thought about it a little bit more, and  the prefix specification 
>> has not too much sense (more if we implement this functionality as 
>> function "unistr"). I removed the optional argument and renamed the 
>> function to "unistr". The functionality is the same. Now it supports 
>> Oracle convention, Java and Python (for Python UXXXXXXXX) and 
>> \+XXXXXX. These formats was already supported.The compatibility witth 
>> Oracle is nice.
> 
> Peter, it looks like Pavel has aligned this function with unistr() as 
> you suggested. Thoughts?

I haven't read through the patch in detail yet, but I support the 
proposed details of the functionality.