Re: Replace uses of deprecated Python module distutils.sysconfig
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replace uses of deprecated Python module distutils.sysconfig |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2160651.1643064318@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replace uses of deprecated Python module distutils.sysconfig (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replace uses of deprecated Python module distutils.sysconfig
Re: Replace uses of deprecated Python module distutils.sysconfig |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > ... But none of the systems report a get_python_inc(False) differing from > get_python_inc(True), or from the value of INCLUDEPY. So I don't see a reason > for why it'd not? Yeah, I was just noticing that. It looks like the whole business with checking both get_python_inc(False) and get_python_inc(True) has been useless from the start: none of the buildfarm animals report more than one -I switch in "checking Python include directories". It's a little bit too soon to decide that INCLUDEPY is reliably equal to that, but if it still looks that way tomorrow, I'll be satisfied. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: