Re: BUG #16079: Question Regarding the BUG #16064
От
Stephen Frost
Тема
Re: BUG #16079: Question Regarding the BUG #16064
Дата
Msg-id
20201221005825.GQ16415@tamriel.snowman.net
Ответ на
Re: BUG #16079: Question Regarding the BUG #16064 (Magnus Hagander)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
BUG #16079: Question Regarding the BUG #16064 PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
Re: BUG #16079: Question Regarding the BUG #16064 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: BUG #16079: Question Regarding the BUG #16064 Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #16079: Question Regarding the BUG #16064 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: BUG #16079: Question Regarding the BUG #16064 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: BUG #16079: Question Regarding the BUG #16064 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: BUG #16079: Question Regarding the BUG #16064 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Greetings, * Magnus Hagander (magnus@hagander.net) wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 5:42 AM Thomas Munro wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:48 AM Stephen Frost wrote: > > > Uh, the user's credentials certainly are sent to the PG server. > > > > Perhaps we should log a warning when PostgreSQL has received a > > password over the network without SSL. Perhaps we should log another > > warning when PostgreSQL has sent a password over the network without > > SSL. > > For the old plaintext "password" method, we log a warning when we parse the > configuration file. > > Maybe we should do the same for LDAP (and RADIUS)? This seems like a better > place to put it than to log it at every time it's received? A dollar short and a year late, but ... +1. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Andrey Borodin
Дата:
От: Michael Paquier
Дата: