Re: [PATCH] Tab completion for VACUUM of partitioned tables

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 01:27:07PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Good catch. The patch looks good to me.

While this patch is logically correct.  I think that we should try to
not increase more the number of queries used to scan pg_class
depending on a list of relkinds.  For example, did you notice that
your new Query_for_list_of_vacuumables becomes the same query as
Query_for_list_of_indexables?  You can make your patch more simple.
--
Michael