Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20181009213709.6dpkhlqdppnjpzxs@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2018-10-09 17:27:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > As discussed below (at [1]), I think we should remove $subject. I plan > > to do so, unless somebody protests soon-ish. I thought it'd be better > > to call attention to this in a new thread, to make sure people had a > > chance to object. > > I complained about this already on the other thread, I think, but: > I do not think we should remove timeofday(). It's unrelated to these > datatypes and it offers functionality that isn't quite duplicated > elsewhere. Ok. I find it a somewhat weird function, but I agree it's not strongly related. It only came up because it's implemented in nabstime.c. Moving it to utils/adt/timestamp.c seems to make the most sense? Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: