Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Stephen Frost
Тема
Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work
Дата
Msg-id
20180813152211.GN3326@tamriel.snowman.net
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work "Phil Endecott" <spam_from_pgsql_lists@chezphil.org>
Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving + streaming to work Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Greetings,

* Andres Freund (andres@anarazel.de) wrote:
> On August 13, 2018 4:59:32 PM GMT+02:00, Phil Endecott  wrote:
>  but in general, I think it's still
> >possible
> >that the master will remove the segment that is needed to start
> >streaming.
> 
> That's why I told you about replication slots....

This should really work even without replication slots though.

Thanks!

Stephen
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
FAQ