Re: pg_ctl status with nonexistent data directory
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_ctl status with nonexistent data directory |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140306141624.GA20070@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_ctl status with nonexistent data directory (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl status with nonexistent data directory
Re: pg_ctl status with nonexistent data directory |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 09:54:57AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > If they haven't passed us a data directory, we don't really know if the > > server is running or not, so the patch just returns '1'. > > But for such cases, isn't the status 4 more appropriate? > As per above link "4 program or service status is unknown" > > status 1 - "1 program is dead and /var/run pid file exists" > Going by this definition, it seems status 1 means, someone > has forcefully killed the server and pid file still remains. Technically, you are right, but I tried a while ago to assign meaningful values to all the exit locations and the community feedback I got was that we didn't want that. I don't see how specifying non-existant or non-cluster directory would somehow be a case that would be special. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: