Re: DATE type output does not follow datestyle parameter

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:08:26PM +0900, MauMau wrote:
> From: "Bruce Momjian" 
> >On Mon, Dec  2, 2013 at 10:22:47PM +0900, MauMau wrote:
> >>So, my suggestion is to just add the following sentence right after
> >>the above one.
> >>
> >>The Postgres style is an exception: the output of the date type is
> >>either MM-DD-YYYY (e.g. 12-17-1997) or DD-MM-YYYY (e.g. 17-12-1997),
> >>which is different from the date part of the output of the timestamp
> >>type.
> >>
> >>Could you consider and add this to the manual?
> >
> >Yes, I will make the change unless someone objects.
> 
> Could you commit this if you feel okay?  I'm sorry if I missed the
> modified article in the devel doc.

OK, attached doc patch applied to head and 9.3.  Thanks for the report.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +