Re: Materialized views WIP patch
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20121115045712.GD12213@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Materialized views WIP patch ("Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn@mail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote: Interesting stuff. > /* > + * SetRelationIsValid > + * Set the value of the relation's relisvalid field in pg_class. > + * > + * NOTE: caller must be holding an appropriate lock on the relation. > + * ShareUpdateExclusiveLock is sufficient. > + * > + * NOTE: an important side-effect of this operation is that an SI invalidation > + * message is sent out to all backends --- including me --- causing plans > + * referencing the relation to be rebuilt with the new list of children. > + * This must happen even if we find that no change is needed in the pg_class > + * row. > + */ > + void > + SetRelationIsValid(Oid relationId, bool relisvalid) > + { It's not clear to me that it's right to do this by doing regular heap updates here instead of heap_inplace_update. Also, I think this might end up causing a lot of pg_class tuple churn (at least for matviews that delete rows at xact end), which would be nice to avoid. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: