Re: Btree or not btree? That is the question
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Btree or not btree? That is the question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20120710173528.GC10995@tinybird.home обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Btree or not btree? That is the question (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:02:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > ... Could you crank up the log verbosity so we can get > file and line number, at least? Here is what the increased verbosity reveals in aggregate. This is about an 18-hour span, covering 12.5M transactions, on version 8.3.18: (13 times) Various OIDs that do exist cannot be found: ERROR: XX000: could not open relation with OID 1554847444 LOCATION: relation_open, heapam.c:879 (21 times) Relations that do exist cannot be found: ERROR: 42P01: relation "foobar" does not exist LOCATION: RangeVarGetRelid, namespace.c:273 (1 time) Qualified relation that exists cannot be found: ERROR: 42P01: relation "public.foobar" does not exist LOCATION: RangeVarGetRelid, namespace.c:268 (5 times) Failure to read a block: XX001: could not read block 3 of relation 1663/1554846571/4184054438: read only 0 of 8192 bytes LOCATION: mdread, md.c:631 (5 times) Cache lookup failure: XX000: cache lookup failed for relation 1554847255 LOCATION: has_subclass, plancat.c:921 -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@endpoint.com End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: