Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on long column values
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on
long column values
Дата
Msg-id
200803051656.m25GuiO17779@momjian.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on long column
values Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on long column values Phil Frost <phil@macprofessionals.com>
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on
long column values Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on long column values Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on long column values "Gurjeet Singh" <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on
long column values Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Phil Frost wrote: > On Mar 5, 2008, at 11:20 , Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Does anyone think it is a good idea to document that our indexes > > cannot > > index arbirarily-long strings? I see nothing in the documentation now > > about it. > > +1 > > I never even knew. I'd be especially interested to hear about > details, like how long strings can be until they are not guaranteed > unique. Part of the problem is we don't know the length --- it is the compressed length that is limited, I think to 8k. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления
От: Phil Frost
Дата:
От: Tom Lane
Дата: