Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Steve Atkins
Тема
Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
Дата
в 12:27:56
Msg-id
20050520152904.GA10786@gp.word-to-the-wise.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: pgFoundry Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 11:59:00PM +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote:

> >Right, if you classify the information coming in, you can set controls
> >over who sees it.  What we don't do now is any kind of classification.
> 
> This may be a bit off-the-wall, but I recall Joel Spolsky recently  
> writing about using Bayesian filtering to classify mail into groups  
> other than spam/ham. I wonder if there's any use for something like  
> that in this case.
> 
> http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/FogBugzII.html

No, definitely not. Pseudo-bayesian classification as used by the more
optimistic spam-filtering folks is pretty crappy at the best of times,
and it's really unusuable for more than 3-4 categories.

There are natural language analysis techniques that'll do this sort of
thing, but they're in the realms of research projects, not canned
tools.

Cheers, Steve


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Two-phase commit issues
От: Ed L.
Дата:
FAQ