Re: 2-phase commit
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 2-phase commit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030929111407.B632@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 2-phase commit (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 2-phase commit
Re: 2-phase commit |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > Master Slave > > > ------ ----- > > > commit ready--> > > > <--OK > > > commit done->XX > > > > > > is the "commit done" message needed ? > > > > Of course ... how else will the Slave commit? From my understanding, the > > concept is that the master sends a commit ready to the slave, but the OK > > back is that "OK, I'm ready to commit whenever you are", at which point > > the master does its commit and tells the slave to do its ... > > Or the slave could reject the request. Huh? The slave has that option?? In what circumstance?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: