Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200303180040.h2I0edq02693@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane writes: > > > * Backend's ReadyForQuery message (Z message) should carry an indication > > of current transaction status (idle/in transaction/in aborted transaction) > > so that frontend need not guess at state. Perhaps also indicate > > autocommit status. > > If we do this, could we get rid of the messy autocommit GUC option and > handle autocommit in the client? Before sending a command, the client > could check the transaction status and automatically choose to start a new > transaction. That way we could get rid of the current mess that every > client needs to send a SET autocommit command before it can safely do > anything. What if folks want all their connections autocommit off. Seems it is best in the server. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: