Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200301032315.h03NFSU21015@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped? (Florian Weimer <Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE>) |
Ответы |
Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Florian Weimer wrote: > "Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > > > Christopher Kings-Lynne said: > >> There have been HEAPS of security fixes between 7.2 and 7.3. > > > > That's only the case if your definition of a "security fix" is pretty fast > > and loose -- as yours seems to be. > > Hmm? On 7.2, an unpriviliged database user can read the more or less > the whole memory image of the server process. On 7.3, this has been > fixed. Huh. Never heard that before. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: