Re: timeout implementation issues

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > Why should the SET query_timeout = 0 command be issued
> > > only when the query failed ? Is it a JDBC driver's requirement
> > > or some applications' requirements which uses the JDBC driver ?
> > 
> > They want the timeout for only the one statement, so they have to set it
> > to non-zero before the statement, and to zero after the statement.
> 
> Does setQueryTimeout() issue a corresponding SET QUERY_TIMEOUT
> command immediately in the scenario ?

Yes.  If we don't make the SET rollback-able, we have to do all sorts of
tricks in jdbc so aborted transactions get the proper SET value.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026