Re: pg_class -> reltuples?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_class -> reltuples? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200203072211.g27MBTA17029@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_class -> reltuples? (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_class -> reltuples?
Archive search (was: pg_class -> reltuples?) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there a reason why the reltuples column of pg_class is stored as a > "real", rather than one of the integer data types? Are there any > situations in which there will be a non-integer value stored in this > column? That is an excellent question. I assume it is related to having > 4 billion rows, but we have int8 for that. The value is used mostly by the optimizer, which does most of its calcultions using float8 (real), so that may be why. > P.S. I tried to search the archives, but archives.postgresql.org is so > slow, it's basically unusable. So my apologies if this has already been > discussed... Yes, it is hampering me from researching some of these patches too, and fts is completely down. If I could just get a web page of all the threads (forget searching), I would be happy. The archives site contents hasn't been updated since Feb 28. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: