Re: email time warps

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:28:35AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> so that any further regurgitations won't get through.  Are you seeing
> new old stuff?  I'm not...

Well, I just saw some items dated May, 2001.  I didn't save them though.

However, since I sent that email, I've received the following:

   6 N   Nov 16 James Huang     (  97) [GENERAL] [ANN] A Genuine JDBC Scripting
  10 N   Nov 18 Eric Theis      (  16) [ADMIN] Postmaster will not start???
  11 N   Nov 19 Raoul Callaghan (  61) [GENERAL] Postmaster on OSX 10.1.1 what's
  12 N   Nov 18 Peter Ondruska  (  23) [GENERAL] build fails on Solaris 8 x_86 w
  15 N   Nov 19 dino ck         (   8) [SQL] How to return more than one row of
  16 N   Nov 19 Neil Zanella    (  17) [GENERAL] checking date format with postg

Now, the 19th doesn't really surprise me.  After all, I know that email is
not supposed to be an instaneous communication medium.

However, the 16th?

Upon closer inspection, is shows:

Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
        by rs.postgresql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAK5bpx39293
        for <dalgoda@ix.netcom.com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 23:38:16 -0600 (CST)
        (envelope-from pgsql-general-owner+M17719=ix.netcom.com=dalgoda@postgresql.org)

Received: from news.tht.net (news.hub.org [216.126.91.242])
        by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAH85Nm65518
        for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 03:05:23 -0500 (EST)
        (envelope-from news@news.tht.net)

Organization: http://groups.google.com/

Looks like maybe degoogleja is a little behind the times?

mrc
--
     Mike Castle      dalgoda@ix.netcom.com      www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
    We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan.  -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc