Re: beta3
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: beta3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20011118224215.F82429-100000@earth.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: beta3 (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: beta3
Re: beta3 Re: beta3 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Okay, how do we want to address/fix/test this? On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane writes: > > > The packaging problems need to be solved before we can build a release > > candidate --- but I don't see why they should hold up beta3. beta2 has > > the same problems, so beta3 wouldn't be a regression. > > Considering the history of how-do-we-get-the-docs-in-the-tarball problem, > I'd like to see at least one beta where this works before shipping a > release candidate. Otherwise I'll have no confidence at all that we're > not going to ship the final release with last year's docs and no man > pages. > > -- > Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: