Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200107190000.f6J00AF05219@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Remember most pg_description comments are not on column but on functions > > and stuff. That attributenumber is not going to apply there. > > Sure, it'd just be zero for non-column items. What do we do with other columns that need descriptions and don't have oid column. Make the attribute column mean something else? I just don't see a huge gain here and lots of confusion. User tables are a different story. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: