Re: Rule recompilation
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rule recompilation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200107121812.f6CICE404911@jupiter.us.greatbridge.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Rule recompilation ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rule recompilation
Re: Rule recompilation |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mikheev, Vadim wrote: > > > In good world rules (PL functions etc) should be automatically > > > marked as dirty (ie recompilation required) whenever referenced > > > objects are changed. > > > > Yepp, and it'd be possible for rules (just not right now). > > But we're not in a really good world, so it'll not be > > possible for PL's. > > Why is it possible in Oracle' world? -:) Because of there limited features? Think about a language like PL/Tcl. At the time you call a script for execution, you cannot even be sure that the Tcl bytecode compiler parsed anything, so how will you ever know the complete set of objects referenced from thisfunction? And PL/pgSQL? We don't prepare all the statements into SPI plans at compile time. We wait until the separate branches are needed, so how do you know offhand here? In the PL/pgSQL case it *might* be possible. But is it worth it? Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com # _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: