Re: varchar vs. text
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: varchar vs. text |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200107111356.f6BDuR419767@jupiter.us.greatbridge.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | varchar vs. text (Rachit Siamwalla <rachit@ensim.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: varchar vs. text
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Rachit Siamwalla wrote: > > Is there any good reason to use VARCHAR over TEXT for a string field? ie. > performance hits, etc. > > Other than running into the row size limit problem, are there any large > storage / performance penalties of using TEXT for virtually all strings? Er - what kind of "row size limit"? I remember vaguely that there was something the like in ancient releases, but forgot the specific restrictions. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com # _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: