Re: Performance monitor signal handler
| От | Jan Wieck |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Performance monitor signal handler |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200103162118.QAA07843@jupiter.jw.home обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Performance monitor signal handler (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Performance monitor signal handler
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Now this would put a pretty tight time constraint on the collector: > fall more than 4K behind, you start losing data. I am not sure if > a UDP socket would provide more buffering or not; anyone know? Looks like Linux has something around 16-32K of buffer space for UDP sockets. Just from eyeballing the fprintf(3) output of my destructively hacked postleprechaun. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com # _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: