Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication
Дата
Msg-id
1639549.1639864267@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication (Tomas Vondra)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
sequences vs. synchronous replication Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Tomas Vondra writes: > What do you mean by "not caching unused sequence numbers"? Reducing > SEQ_LOG_VALS to 1, i.e. WAL-logging every sequence increment? Right. > That'd work, but I wonder how significant the impact will be. As I said, we've accepted worse in order to have stable replication behavior. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
