Re: SPGist "triple parity" concept doesn't work

Teodor Sigaev  writes:
>> Anyway I now think that we might be better off with the other idea of
>> abandoning an insertion and retrying if we get a lock conflict.

> done, look at the patch.

Looks good, committed with some cosmetic adjustments.

> We definetly need new idea of locking protocol and I'll return to this
> problem at autumn (sorry, I havn't time in summer to do this
> research).

OK.  I think the performance of this way will be okay, actually, in most
cases anyhow.  It'll do till we have a better idea.
		regards, tom lane