Re: postgres processes spending most of their time in the kernel
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: postgres processes spending most of their time in the kernel
Дата
Msg-id
15320.1009578375@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: postgres processes spending most of their time in the (Jeffrey W. Baker)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: postgres processes spending most of their time in the kernel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: postgres processes spending most of their time in the "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org>
Re: postgres processes spending most of their time in the kernel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: postgres processes spending most of their time in the "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org>
Re: postgres processes spending most of their time in the kernel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: postgres processes spending most of their time in the "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org>
"Jeffrey W. Baker" writes: > strace unfortunately doesn't deref the sembuf structure in semop. Right, but the PC would be enough to let us tell whether semop was being called from IpcSemaphoreLock or IpcSemaphoreUnlock. However, if the info isn't available then no use crying over it. What we'll need to do instead is add some debugging printouts to lwlock.c, and hope that the extra logfile I/O calls don't change the timing enough to hide the misbehavior. I'll think a little about this and send you an updated lwlock.c to try out. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Jeffrey W. Baker
Дата:
От: Jeffrey W. Baker
Дата: