Re: [doc] remove reference to pg_dump pre-8.1 switch behaviour

Michael Paquier  writes:
> So this comes down to 5 items, as per the attached.  Thoughts?

These items look fine to me, except this bit seems a bit awkward:

+     Note that the delayed indexing technique used for GIN
+     (see  for details) makes this advice
+     less necessary, but for very large updates it may still be best to
+     drop and recreate the index.

Less necessary than what?  Maybe instead write

      When fastupdate is enabled (see ...), the penalty is much less than
      when it is not.  But for very large updates it may still be best to
      drop and recreate the index.

			regards, tom lane