Re: offline consistency check and info on attributes
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: offline consistency check and info on attributes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1303748073-sup-5070@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | offline consistency check and info on attributes (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: offline consistency check and info on attributes
Re: offline consistency check and info on attributes |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tomas Vondra's message of dom abr 24 13:49:31 -0300 2011: > Right now I do have a very simple tool that reads a given file and > performs a lot of checks at the block level (as described in bufpage.h), > and the next step should be validating basic structure of the tuples > (lengths). And that's the point where I'm stuck right now - I'm thinking > what might be the most elegant way to get info about attributes, without > access to the pg_attribute catalog (the tool is intended for offline > checks). Each tuple declares its length. You don't need to know each attribute's length to check that. Doing attribute-level checks is probably pointless without catalog access. > I've figured out the catalog-to-file mapping (in relmapper.c), but now > I'm wondering - it's just another relation, so I'd have to read the > block, parse the items and interpret them (not sure how to do that > without the pg_attribute data itself). So I wonder - what would be an > elegant solution? This reminds me -- we need to have pg_filedump be able to dump the relmapper stuff. I was going to write a patch for it but then I forgot. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: