Re: Confusing performance of specific query

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Adam Endicott
Тема
Re: Confusing performance of specific query
Дата
Msg-id
1186762512.103736.311160@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Confusing performance of specific query Adam Endicott <leftwing17@gmail.com>
Re: Confusing performance of specific query Adam Endicott <leftwing17@gmail.com>
Re: Confusing performance of specific query Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Confusing performance of specific query Adam Endicott <leftwing17@gmail.com>
Re: Confusing performance of specific query Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Aug 9, 10:47 pm, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) wrote:
> Do you have comparable work_mem settings on both machines?  Another
> thing to look at, if any of the sort key columns are textual, is whether
> the lc_collate settings are the same.

work_mem is commented out in both postgresql.conf files:
desktop: #work_mem = 1MB
production: #work_mem = 1024

So I guess they use the defaults?

Ahh, but lc_collate is different (assuming I'm finding it right). On
my machine it's set to "C", and on the production server it's set to
"en_US.UTF-8". I'm going to have to do some research to figure out
what that does.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Carlos Ortíz
Дата:
От: Pat Maddox
Дата:
FAQ