pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1128176d-1eee-55d4-37ca-e63644422adb@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds
Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, While experimenting with parallel index builds, I've noticed a somewhat strange behavior of pg_stat_progress_create_index when a btree index is built with parallel workers - some of the phases seem to be missing. In serial (no parallelism) mode, the progress is roughly this (it's always the first/last timestamp of each phase): | command | phase -------------+--------------+---------------------------------------- 12:56:01 AM | CREATE INDEX | building index: scanning table ... 01:06:22 AM | CREATE INDEX | building index: scanning table 01:06:23 AM | CREATE INDEX | building index: sorting live tuples ... 01:13:10 AM | CREATE INDEX | building index: sorting live tuples 01:13:11 AM | CREATE INDEX | building index: loading tuples in tree ... 01:24:02 AM | CREATE INDEX | building index: loading tuples in tree So it goes through three phases: 1) scanning tuples 2) sorting live tuples 3) loading tuples in tree But with parallel build index build, it changes to: | command | phase -------------+--------------+---------------------------------------- 11:40:48 AM | CREATE INDEX | building index: scanning table ... 11:47:24 AM | CREATE INDEX | building index: scanning table (scan complete) 11:56:22 AM | CREATE INDEX | building index: scanning table 11:56:23 AM | CREATE INDEX | building index: loading tuples in tree ... 12:05:33 PM | CREATE INDEX | building index: loading tuples in tree That is, the "sorting live tuples" phase disappeared, and instead it seems to be counted in the "scanning table" one, as if there was an update of the phase missing. I've only tried this on master, but I assume it behaves like this in the older releases too. I wonder if this is intentional - it sure is a bit misleading. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: