Re: [HACKERS] port of INSTALL file generation to XSLT

On 2/28/17 08:57, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>     It appears we need pandoc 1.13 to get the good output.  This won't be
>     available until Debian stretch.
> 
>     So for PG10, I propose the attached revised patch which keeps using lynx
>     but uses xsltproc instead of jade.
> 
> 
> It is available for people not using debian though? Might it be
> worthwhile to make it dependent on the version of pandoc -- so use that
> method if people have the newer pandoc and fall back to lynx if they don't? 

Well, this really only runs once every couple of months on borka and
here or there for those building their own snapshot tarballs.  I don't
think we need to cater to a wide audience here.  In fact, variety could
be bad here:  We don't want to find out that a tarball was rolled with
the wrong variant.

The pandoc change can be revisited independently.  The main point right
now is to get away from the DSSSL toolchain.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services