Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreignservers
От | vinayak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreignservers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 02ab0cf3-e154-158e-3127-1b58804411bc@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/02/28 16:54, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
Thank you for creating the wiki page.I've created a wiki page[1] describing about the design and functionality of this feature. Also it has some examples of use case, so this page would be helpful for even testing. Please refer it if you're interested in testing this feature. [1] 2PC on FDW <https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/2PC_on_FDW>
In the "src/test/regress/pg_regress.c" file
- * xacts. (Note: to reduce the probability of unexpected shmmax
- * failures, don't set max_prepared_transactions any higher than
- * actually needed by the prepared_xacts regression test.)
+ * xacts. We also set max_fdw_transctions to enable testing of atomic
+ * foreign transactions. (Note: to reduce the probability of unexpected
+ * shmmax failures, don't set max_prepared_transactions or
+ * max_prepared_foreign_transactions any higher than actually needed by the
+ * corresponding regression tests.).
I think we are not setting the "max_fdw_transctions" anywhere.
Is this correct?
In the "src/bin/pg_waldump/rmgrdesc.c" file following header file used two times.
+ #include "access/fdw_xact.h"
I think we need to remove one line.
Regards,
Vinayak Pokale
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: