> On 8 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think the main point is to make sure that the test script reached an
> intended exit point, rather than dying early someplace. It's not apparent
> to me why reaching a done_testing() call is a less reliable indicator of
> that than executing some specific number of tests --- and I agree with
> ilmari that maintaining the test count is a serious PITA.
FWIW I agree with this and am in favor of using done_testing().
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/