Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote:
> > Re the coding of the padding computation, seems it'd be better to use > > our standard "offsetof(last-struct-member) + sizeof(last-struct-member)" > > rather than adding each of the members' sizes individually. > > It was done so in order to evade extra level of nesting for PGXACT. See > discussion with Tom Lane in [1] and upthread.
Yes, I understand. I just mean that it could be done something like this: