All,
On Saturday, September 27, 2014, Andrew Dunstan <
andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
On 09/27/2014 10:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
On 09/27/2014 06:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
So my vote is for a separate function and no optional arguments.
You mean like row_to_json_no_nulls() and json_agg_no_nulls()?
I thought you were proposing that we should revert the committed patch
lock-stock-n-barrel, and instead invent json_strip_null_fields().
That's instead, not in addition to. Even if you weren't saying that
exactly, that's where my vote goes.
I was just exploring alternatives. But I think that's where my vote goes too.
I'm fine with that. I'd like the strip-Nulls capability, but seems like it'd be better off as an independent function (or functions) instead.
Thanks,
Stephen