Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZSgGCBm-5YerVq++eF+X30+m7CR-SVr2rvK9zGnmBAJYw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}  (Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi.kaariainen@thl.fi>)
Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Yes, I think that's pretty important. With a negative attno so it's
> treated as a "hidden" col that must be explicitly named to be shown and
> won't be confused with user columns.

I think that the standard for adding a new system attribute ought to
be enormous. The only case where a new one was added post-Postgres95
was "tableoid". I'm pretty sure that others aren't going to want to do
it that way. Besides, I'm not entirely convinced that this is actually
an important distinction to expose.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SSL regression test suite