On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:15 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 06:48:43PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > Personally, I tend to agree with v4-0001 (option (4)) or v4-0002
> > (option (3)) than v4-0003 (option (1)) as it adds more unreadability
> > with most of the code duplicated creating more diff with previous
> > versions and maintainability problems. Having said that, I will leave
> > it to the committer to decide on that.
>
> I don't think v4-0003/option 1 needs to be unreadable. Perhaps we can use
> a StringInfo to build the message. That might be a net improvement in
> readability anyway.
Looks like we already use StringInfo in PerformAuthentication for
"connection" related log messages, see [1].
I will give it a try using StringInfo for the "checkpoint/restartpoint
complete" message too.
[1]
if (Log_connections)
{
StringInfoData logmsg;
initStringInfo(&logmsg);
if (am_walsender)
appendStringInfo(&logmsg, _("replication connection
authorized: user=%s"),
port->user_name);
else
appendStringInfo(&logmsg, _("connection authorized: user=%s"),
port->user_name);
if (!am_walsender)
appendStringInfo(&logmsg, _(" database=%s"), port->database_name);
Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.