Re: Refactoring GUC unit conversions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: Refactoring GUC unit conversions
Дата
Msg-id CAHGQGwEMKNjKigWA8L5fXoOKz7psEo3q16teAb29MkYuW3nd3A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Refactoring GUC unit conversions  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
> In the "redesign checkpoint_segments" patch, Robert suggested keeping the
> settings' base unit as "number of segments", but allow conversions from MB,
> GB etc. I started looking into that and found that adding a new unit to
> guc.c is quite messy. The conversions are done with complicated
> if-switch-case constructs.
>
> Attached is a patch to refactor that, making the conversions table-driven.
> This doesn't change functionality, it just makes the code nicer.

Isn't it good idea to allow even wal_keep_segments to converse from MB, GB etc?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeevan Chalke
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage
Следующее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How about to have relnamespace and relrole?