Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wzn9GtSqYcZT+t_8Ogn_jXn0e3zhXtXjyNTnee42JyvZsg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration  (Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback@gmail.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration  ("Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert@amazon.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:13 AM Matthias van de Meent
<boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree. I believe that Babelfish's efforts can be compared with the
> zedstore and zheap efforts: they require work in core before they can
> be integrated or added as an extension that could replace the normal
> heap tableam, and while core is being prepared we can discover what
> can and cannot be prepared in core for this new feature.

I see what you mean, but even that seems generous to me, since, as I
said, we don't have any Babelfish code to evaluate today. Whereas
Zedstore and zheap can actually be downloaded and tested.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration
Следующее
От: Mark Rofail
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays